Prolonged administration of intratecal morphine by infusion pump implanted in a case of non-oncological chronic pain

  • Santiago Ayala
  • Javier Pietropinto
  • Walter Ayala
Keywords: Intrathecal opioid, Intrathecal morphine, Intrathecal pump, Noncancer pain

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The evolution of a patient who was implanted with an intrathecal infusion pump of morphine 14 years ago is described for the treatment of chronic lumbar pain post-laminectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: It required the administration of 60 mg / day of subcutaneous morphine that caused side effects that did not tolerate, and multiple hospitalizations for pain control. He was implanted with a continuous infusion pump (Isomed) connected to a subarachnoid catheter, which releases 1 ml / day, and needs to be filled every 60 days.

RESULTS: An average pain decrease of 50% per year, and 75% at 6 and 12 years was observed. It required a progressive increase in filling doses, which went from 30 mg of morphine (0.5 mg / day) at the beginning, to 40 mg of morphine (0.66 mg / day per year, to 70 mg of morphine (1.16 mg / day) at age 6, at 140 mg (2.33 mg / day) at age 14. No serious medical complications were recorded, he maintained constipation and sweating throughout the period, and installed secondary hypogonadism with libido and erection disorders, that were corrected with the administration of testosterone. No further hospitalizations were required due to pain. No complications were observed related to the operation or filling of the pump or linked to the catheter. The patient stated that he was satisfied with the implant.

DISCUSSION: Despite the increase in filling doses, expression of tolerance development, the required morphine / day doses are frankly below the recommended limit.

CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness balance of the implant was positive, considering the best pain control, the lowest doses used, the absence of serious complications, and the lack of hospitalizations for pain control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Trescot A, Glaser SE, Hansen H, Benyamin R, Patel S, Mnchikanti L. Effectiveness of opioids in the treatment on non-cancer pain. Pain Physician 2008; 11(2 Suppl): S181-200.
(2) Deer TR, Pope JE, Hayek SM, Lamer TJ, Veizi IE, Erdek M, et al. The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations for Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Guidance for Improving Safety and Mitigating Risks. Neuromodulation 2017; 20 (2): 155-176.
(3) Chalil A, Staudt MD, Harland TA, Leimer EM, Bhullar R, Argoff CE. A safety review of approved intrathecal analgesics for chronic pain management. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20 (4): 439-451. Doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1889513.
(4) Sommer B, Karageorgos N, AlSharif M, Stubbe H, Hans FJ. Long-term Outcome and Adverse Events of Intrathecal Opioid Therapy for Nonmalignant Pain Syndrome. Pain Pract 2020; 20 (1): 8-15.
(5) Kleinmann B, Wolter T. Intrathecal Opioid Therapy for Non-Malignant Chronic Pain: A log-Term Perspective. Neuromodulation 2017; 20(7): 719-726.
(6) Duarte RV, Raphael JH, Sparkes E, Southall JL, LeMarchand K, Ashford RL. Long-term intrathecal drug administration for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2012; 24: 63-70.
(7) Santiago Ayala, Javier Pietropinto, Walter Ayala. Analgesia con morfina intratecal por bomba de infusión implantada en un caso de dolor crónico no oncológico. Anest Analg Reanim 2013; 26(2): 4-10.
(8) Deer TR, Pope JE, Hayek SM, Bux A, Buchser E, Eldabe S, et al. The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations on Intrathecal Drug Infusion Systems Best Practices and Guidelines. Neuromodulation 2017; 20(2): 96-132.
(9) Winkelmuller M, Winkelmuller W. Long-term effects of continuous intrathecal opioid treatment in chronic pain of non-malignant etiology. J Neurosurg 1996; 85: 458-467.
(10) Santiago Ayala, Ana Pena, Javier Pietropinto, Walter Ayala. Hipogonadismo en paciente tratado con morfina intratecal por bomba de infusión implantada. Anest Analg Reanim 2013; 26(2): 12-18.
(11) Abs R, Verhelst J, Maeyaert J, Van Buyten JP, Opsomer F, Adriaensen H, et al. Endocrine consequences of long-term intrathecal administration of opiods. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85(6): 2215-2222.
(12) Duarte RV, Raphael JH, Labib M, Southall JL, Ashford RL. Prevalence and influence of diagnostic criteria in the assessment of hypogonadism in intrathecal opioid therapy patients. Pain Physician 2013; 16: 9-14.
(13) Kim AJ, Basu S, Glass C, Ross EL, Agar N, He Q, et al. . Unique Intradural Inflammatory Mass Containing Precipitated Morphine. Confirmatory Analysis by LESA-MS and MALDI-MS. Pain Pract 2018; 18(7): 889-894.
(14) Aldrete JA, Couto Da Silva JM. Leg edema from intrathecal opiate infusions. Eur J Pain 2000; 4(4): 361-365.
(15) Hu K, Connelly NR, Vieira P. Withdrawal symptoms in a patient receiving intrathecal morphine via an infusion pump. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14(8): 595-597.
Published
2022-03-29
How to Cite
Ayala, S., Pietropinto, J., & Ayala, W. (2022). Prolonged administration of intratecal morphine by infusion pump implanted in a case of non-oncological chronic pain . Anales De La Facultad De Medicina, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.25184/anfamed2022v9n1a4