Rights and experiences of pregnant adolescents in prenatal care in Uruguay
Abstract
This study explored the experiences and perceptions of pregnant adolescents regarding maternal care received during prenatal consultations in the Primary Health Care of the Integrated National Health System in Uruguay. A qualitative exploratory approach was used, conducting semi-structured interviews with 12 young women aged 15 to 19 in the early postpartum months, who had attended public and private prenatal consultations. Thematic analysis identified key dimensions related to communication and access to information, healthcare staff attitudes, and autonomy in decision-making. Findings showed that incomplete communication and technical language hindered understanding, while paternalistic attitudes and lack of recognition of autonomy generated insecurity and distrust. However, adolescents valued empathetic care and the possibility of choosing their healthcare provider, which enhanced trust and support. It is concluded that ensuring respectful maternal care, clear communication, and active participation in health decisions is
essential to improve prenatal care quality and promote the rights of pregnant adolescents. Training healthcare staff in rights-based and comprehensive care approaches is recommended.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization. Adolescent health. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015;86(6):436–43.
Doyenart M, Varela C. Saltando etapas del curso de vida: maternidad en la adolescencia. Cuad CLAEH. 2017;36(106):37–56.
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Violencia y discriminación contra mujeres, niñas y adolescentes. Washington DC: CIDH; 2019.
Cabella W, Soto MF, Pardo I, Pedetti G. El gran declive. Demogr Res. 2024;50:443–56.
López-Gómez A, Varela C. Maternidad en adolescentes y desigualdades sociales en Uruguay. Montevideo: Udelar-UNFPA; 2016.
Oliver Q. La Convención en tus manos. Montevideo: UNICEF; 2004.
Uruguay. Ley N° 17.823. Código de la Niñez y la Adolescencia. Montevideo: IMPO; 2004.
Uruguay. Ley N° 19.580. Violencia hacia las mujeres basada en género. Montevideo: IMPO; 2018.
Ministerio de Desarrollo Social. Segunda Encuesta Nacional de Prevalencia de Violencia Basada en Género. Montevideo: MIDES; 2019.
Magnone Alemán N, Farías Rodríguez MC. Violencia obstétrica en Uruguay. Musas. 2022;7(2):62–80.
Mujer y Salud en Uruguay. Violencia obstétrica en cifras. Montevideo: MYSU; 2022.
World Health Organization. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during childbirth. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
Castro R, Frías SM. Obstetric violence in Mexico: results from a 2016 national household survey. Violence Against Women. 2020;26(6-7):555-72. doi: 10.1177/107780121983673.
Quattrocchi P. Obstetric Violence Observatory: Contributions of Argentina to the International Debate. Med Anthropol. 2019;38(8):762-76. doi:10.1080/01459740.2019.1609471.
Castro R, Frías S, editores. Violencia obstétrica y ciencias sociales: estudios críticos en América Latina. México: CRIM; 2022.
Massó Guijarro E. La violencia obstétrica como injusticia epistémica. Salud Colectiva. 2023;19:e4464. doi:10.18294/sc.2023.4464.
Menéndez EL. Modelo médico hegemónico: tendencias posibles y tendencias más o menos imaginarias. Salud Colect. 2020;16:e2615. doi: 10.18294/sc.2020.2615.
Magnone N. Institucionalización y medicalización del parto en Uruguay (1920-1960): tensiones para la autonomía reproductiva de las mujeres (tesis doctoral). Montevideo: Universidad de la República; 2022.
López-Gómez A. Adolescentes y sexualidad en Uruguay. Montevideo: Universidad de la República, UNFPA; 2015.
Palacios M. Investigación cualitativa en salud. Buenos Aires: Lugar Editorial; 2007.
Hernández-Sampieri R, Mendoza C. Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw-Hill; 2020.
Sautu R, Boniolo P, Dalle P, Elbert R. Manual de metodología: construcción del marco teórico, formulación de los objetivos y elección de la metodología. Buenos Aires: CLACSO; 2005.
Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847.
Tunçalp Ö, Were WM, MacLennan C, Oladapo OT, Gülmezoglu AM, Bahl R, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns: the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1045-9. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13451.
Del Risco O, Zambrano E, Guerrero N, Surita F. Buenas prácticas en la atención prenatal a adolescentes embarazadas: perspectivas de profesionales de la salud. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2021;72(3):244-58. doi:10.18597/rcog.3695.
Poffald L, Hirmas M, Aguilera X, Vega J, González MJ, Sanhueza G. Barreras y facilitadores para el control prenatal en adolescentes: resultados de un estudio cualitativo en Chile. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55(6):572-9.
Arias M. La atención de la salud de la población adolescente: un estudio desde la perspectiva de los adolescentes (tesis de maestría). Montevideo: Universidad de la República; 2017.
Sandall J, Fernandez C, Devane D, Soltani H, Gillespie P, Gates S, et al. Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024;4:CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub6.
Copyright (c) 2026 Andrea Akar Moreno, Carolina Farias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyright and assign to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. that allows sharing the work as long as the initial publication in this magazine is indicated.
